Which type of traction would likely be preferred for short-term treatment situations?

Skin traction is often preferred for short-term treatment situations because it is less invasive than skeletal traction and can be applied quickly and easily to a patient. This type of traction involves the use of strips of adhesive material or bandages that are applied to the skin and connected to weights. It is effective in managing pain, reducing muscle spasms, and providing stabilization for fractures or dislocations in the early phases of treatment.

In contrast, skeletal traction involves the insertion of pins or screws directly into the bone, which is more suitable for long-term treatment due to its ability to provide stronger and more stable traction. However, it requires a more complex setup, carries a higher risk of infection, and is intended for prolonged use rather than short-term management. Long-term traction is designed for circumstances that necessitate extended periods of force application, making it unsuitable for situations needing rapid intervention. Full-body traction is quite rare and typically not used in standard treatment paradigms, further emphasizing that skin traction is the practical choice for short-term needs.